Download Counter-Terrorism: International Law and Practice by Ana Maria Salinas De Frias, Katja Samuel, Nigel White PDF

By Ana Maria Salinas De Frias, Katja Samuel, Nigel White

The reaction of governments to terrorism is among the so much arguable problems with the twenty-first century. Balancing the need to accomplish protection with the safeguarding of human rights has proved to be hugely contentious.

This booklet analyzes the foreign rule of legislation framework within which counter-terrorism responses take place, specifically these of overseas human rights, humanitarian, legal, and refugee legislation. It makes a speciality of essentially the most urgent, rising and/or under-researched concerns and tensions, together with: the coverage offerings linked to assembly safety imperatives; the tensions among the legal justice method of counter-terrorism and the army method; the id of lacunae inside of current criminal frameworks; and tensions among govt, judicial, and legislative responses.

It addresses quite a lot of matters, similar to: an research of key felony ideas; emergency and government measures; radicalization; governmental impunity; type, management and remedy of battlefield detainees; extrajudicial and detailed killings; different types of, and remedy in, detention; non-refoulement; diplomatic assurances; interrogation as opposed to torture; impressive rendition; discrimination; reparations for sufferers of terrorist assaults and protection responses; (mis)use of army and immigration tribunals; judicial and institutional constructed and rising rule of legislation norms on terrorism; non-judicial oversight through democratic responsibility; importance of rule of legislations ideas to non-legal counter-terrorist coverage; and the identity and research of top practices.

Drawing jointly a magnificent spectrum of felony and non-legal, nationwide and institutional, practitioner, coverage and educational services, this publication is an unmissable reference paintings on all elements of counter-terrorism coverage.

Show description

Read Online or Download Counter-Terrorism: International Law and Practice PDF

Similar terrorism books

Legislative Guide to the Universal Legal Regime against Terrorism

The consultant was once ready for the knowledge of presidency officers and others all in favour of the overseas felony points of the prevention and suppression of terrorism. This up to date model of the consultant is aimed to facilitate the duty of nationwide experts in adopting and enforcing the common criminal regime opposed to terrorism.

Port Security Management, Second Edition

Sea and freshwater ports are a key part of serious infrastructure and crucial for conserving worldwide and household economies. that allows you to successfully safe a dynamic port facility operation, one needs to comprehend the enterprise of maritime trade. Following within the culture of its bestselling predecessor, Port safeguard administration, moment variation keeps to provide readers with this knowing.

Additional info for Counter-Terrorism: International Law and Practice

Example text

468 (14 March 2008) (829 fn 66) Ms X and Ms Y (Argentina), IACHR Report No. h. of the American Convention of Human Rights (Advisory Opinion OC-12/91) IACtHR Series A No 12 (6 December 1991) (791 fn 17) Case of the Constitutional Court v Peru (Merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 71 (31 January 2001) (827 fn 61) Case of Godínez Cruz v Honduras (Judgment on the merits) IACtHR Series C No 5 (20 January 1989) (789 fn 10, 796 fn 43) Case of de la Cruz Flores v Peru (Merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 115 (18 November 2004) (221 fn 67, 792, 792 fn 22, fn 23, 793 fn 24, 795 fn 40, 806 fn 99, 809 fn 123, 834 fn 92, 835 fn 93, fn 94) Case of Durand and Ugarte v Peru (Judgment on the merits) IACtHR Series C No 68 (16 August 2000) (209 fn 9, 380 fn 138, 719 fn 203, 805 fn 98, 806 fn 99, 807, 807 fn 106, 808 fn 115, fn 116) li Table of Cases Case of Enforceability of the Right to Reply or Correction (arts 14(1), 1(1) and 2, American Convention on Human Rights) (Advisory Opinion OC-7/86) IACtHR Series A No 7 (29 August 1986) (791 fn 17) Case of Escher v Brazil (Preliminary objections, merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 200 (6 July 2009) (832 fn 78, fn 80, 833 fn 86, 834 fn 87, fn 88) Case of Ticona Estrada and others v Bolivia (Judgment on the merits, reparation, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 191 (7 November 2008) (806 fn 99) Case of “Five Pensioners” v Peru (Merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 98 (28 February 2003) (815 fn 15) Case of Fairén Garbi and Solís Corrales v Honduras (Judgment on the merits) IACtHR Series C No 6 (15 March 1989) (796 fn 43) Case of Baldeón García v Peru (Merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 147 (6 April 2006) (221 fn 57, 793 fn 28, 795 fn 38, fn 40, 796 fn 41, fn 42) Case of Servellón García and others v Honduras (Judgment on reparations and costs) IACtHR Series C No 152 (21 September 2006) (804 fn 90) Case of González and others (‘Cotton Field’) v Mexico (Judgment on preliminary exception, merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 205 (16 November 2009) (808 fn 116, 821 fn 38) Case of Habeas corpus in Emergency Situations (Arts.

Of the American Convention of Human Rights (Advisory Opinion OC-12/91) IACtHR Series A No 12 (6 December 1991) (791 fn 17) Case of the Constitutional Court v Peru (Merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 71 (31 January 2001) (827 fn 61) Case of Godínez Cruz v Honduras (Judgment on the merits) IACtHR Series C No 5 (20 January 1989) (789 fn 10, 796 fn 43) Case of de la Cruz Flores v Peru (Merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 115 (18 November 2004) (221 fn 67, 792, 792 fn 22, fn 23, 793 fn 24, 795 fn 40, 806 fn 99, 809 fn 123, 834 fn 92, 835 fn 93, fn 94) Case of Durand and Ugarte v Peru (Judgment on the merits) IACtHR Series C No 68 (16 August 2000) (209 fn 9, 380 fn 138, 719 fn 203, 805 fn 98, 806 fn 99, 807, 807 fn 106, 808 fn 115, fn 116) li Table of Cases Case of Enforceability of the Right to Reply or Correction (arts 14(1), 1(1) and 2, American Convention on Human Rights) (Advisory Opinion OC-7/86) IACtHR Series A No 7 (29 August 1986) (791 fn 17) Case of Escher v Brazil (Preliminary objections, merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 200 (6 July 2009) (832 fn 78, fn 80, 833 fn 86, 834 fn 87, fn 88) Case of Ticona Estrada and others v Bolivia (Judgment on the merits, reparation, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 191 (7 November 2008) (806 fn 99) Case of “Five Pensioners” v Peru (Merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 98 (28 February 2003) (815 fn 15) Case of Fairén Garbi and Solís Corrales v Honduras (Judgment on the merits) IACtHR Series C No 6 (15 March 1989) (796 fn 43) Case of Baldeón García v Peru (Merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 147 (6 April 2006) (221 fn 57, 793 fn 28, 795 fn 38, fn 40, 796 fn 41, fn 42) Case of Servellón García and others v Honduras (Judgment on reparations and costs) IACtHR Series C No 152 (21 September 2006) (804 fn 90) Case of González and others (‘Cotton Field’) v Mexico (Judgment on preliminary exception, merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 205 (16 November 2009) (808 fn 116, 821 fn 38) Case of Habeas corpus in Emergency Situations (Arts.

468 (14 March 2008) (829 fn 66) Ms X and Ms Y (Argentina), IACHR Report No. h. of the American Convention of Human Rights (Advisory Opinion OC-12/91) IACtHR Series A No 12 (6 December 1991) (791 fn 17) Case of the Constitutional Court v Peru (Merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 71 (31 January 2001) (827 fn 61) Case of Godínez Cruz v Honduras (Judgment on the merits) IACtHR Series C No 5 (20 January 1989) (789 fn 10, 796 fn 43) Case of de la Cruz Flores v Peru (Merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 115 (18 November 2004) (221 fn 67, 792, 792 fn 22, fn 23, 793 fn 24, 795 fn 40, 806 fn 99, 809 fn 123, 834 fn 92, 835 fn 93, fn 94) Case of Durand and Ugarte v Peru (Judgment on the merits) IACtHR Series C No 68 (16 August 2000) (209 fn 9, 380 fn 138, 719 fn 203, 805 fn 98, 806 fn 99, 807, 807 fn 106, 808 fn 115, fn 116) li Table of Cases Case of Enforceability of the Right to Reply or Correction (arts 14(1), 1(1) and 2, American Convention on Human Rights) (Advisory Opinion OC-7/86) IACtHR Series A No 7 (29 August 1986) (791 fn 17) Case of Escher v Brazil (Preliminary objections, merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 200 (6 July 2009) (832 fn 78, fn 80, 833 fn 86, 834 fn 87, fn 88) Case of Ticona Estrada and others v Bolivia (Judgment on the merits, reparation, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 191 (7 November 2008) (806 fn 99) Case of “Five Pensioners” v Peru (Merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 98 (28 February 2003) (815 fn 15) Case of Fairén Garbi and Solís Corrales v Honduras (Judgment on the merits) IACtHR Series C No 6 (15 March 1989) (796 fn 43) Case of Baldeón García v Peru (Merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 147 (6 April 2006) (221 fn 57, 793 fn 28, 795 fn 38, fn 40, 796 fn 41, fn 42) Case of Servellón García and others v Honduras (Judgment on reparations and costs) IACtHR Series C No 152 (21 September 2006) (804 fn 90) Case of González and others (‘Cotton Field’) v Mexico (Judgment on preliminary exception, merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 205 (16 November 2009) (808 fn 116, 821 fn 38) Case of Habeas corpus in Emergency Situations (Arts.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.32 of 5 – based on 24 votes